Should Councillors act on behalf of certain locations?
by PMHC Project Coordinator 2:49pm, 28 October 2009
You will need to login
or sign up to do that
Do you believe Councillors once elected should be assigned to represent certain locations (i.e a Councillor assigned to Wauchope or Camden Haven)
This discussion topic is closed. You can still review the discussion but it will no longer accept comments or votes.
Miriam Comment 1
11:03pm, 29 October 2009
11
1 
NO ALL COUNCILLORS SHOULD ACT FOR THE WHOLE OF THE HASTINGS.
Jay Beaumont Comment 1.1
6:25am, 30 October 2009
4
0
Agreed.
grifwatso Comment 2
7:25am, 30 October 2009
3
6
A councillor for a particular area would have a more intimate knowledge of that particular ward and thus be aware of problems/opportunities, they would be more likely be able to get to know more local people in that area,they would thus be more accountable and their actions in voting more transparent instead of hiding behind group tickets or voting blocks
Lyndal Coote Comment 3
10:31am, 4 November 2009
7
0
I do not agree with the idea of Councillors being assigned to particular areas unless it was in addition to being representatives for the whole of the Hastings as well. That would perpetuate the parochial approach and too many issues are LGA wide in their relevance. As an example, look how much interest has been expressed about Timbertown from people outside Wauchope.
Engaged Comment 4
10:52am, 4 November 2009
2
3
Yes, I agree, as long as this is not to the detriment of the councillor's voice being heard in matters pertaining to the whole of the LGA. Having more local representation would also remove the perception that PM-Hastings Council is only interested in Port Macquarie and not the Camden Haven or Wauchope.
Jaci Comment 5
1:18pm, 4 November 2009
7
1
The LGA cannot afford to have councillors who operate only for their local area. They need to have a concern for the whole of the LGA as we are all interdependent and no one locallity or community within the LGA can operate in isolation.
ifonly Comment 6
3:51pm, 2 December 2009
2
1
I have not heard of such a stupid idea. Councillors should be elected for the whole area and need to represent the whole community. In this day and age of modern communication residents can get to all councillors very easily. This proposal is a step backwards.
cerys Comment 7
11:09am, 21 December 2009
1
1
No they should act for the good of all
streamlined governance Comment 8
12:36pm, 27 December 2009
1
2
This is a great debate and to fully understand the issue you only have to look at states such as WA or Queensland where the idea of Wards is well established. My own thoughts are that having wards would enable a more focused approached to local issues in a particular ward but, more importantly, would make elected members more accountable to their community. This system would still allow public debate and voting on council wide issues and gives voters a local point of contact to air concerns directly etc.
